I would have loved the author to give some of his insights, ideas and interpretations of the science in general and life after death reports specifically. Are people just hallucinating or is there another way of looking at their reports? I came with an open mind and was left with what feels like a mostly academic exercise in Nonsense. After finishing to listen to the audiobook I was left wondering, how is the book useful for the reader in gaining any insight into the known contradictions between science and logic and near death experiences or life after death reports. If the concept of nonsense is supposed to help to gap science and spirituality, i was left wanting. The author claims to be the discoverer of coprology, however John Gregory Bourke documented his findings in this field under the title Scatalogic Rites of All Nations in 1891 and Coprologie Clinique, Exploration-Smiologie et Diagnostic Coprologique was written in 1927 by Jos Mara Rosell and Jean Cambis. Although there is a discussion of physics and life after death experiences, there was no real information on how the new framework can help to gather new insights from existing science or spirituality. The book lays down a really good understanding of the author’s framework of Nonsense and a better understanding of how can research in the future can use this framework to understand and analyse science and experiences of people in the future.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |